(Note to people reading this in a future when they’ve grown up never using a telephone for voice communication with another human: we used to have a game where a message would be distorted by serial whispering, and we found this amusing.)
So apparently Thomas Nagel, who’s an honest-to-Cthulhu serious philosopher, published a book last year called Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False“.
Here’s what Brian Leiter and Michael Weisber wrote in their review in the Nation, on Oct. 3:
Nagel now enters the fray with a far-reaching broadside against Darwin and materialism worthy of the true-believing Plantinga (whom Nagel cites favorably). We suspect that philosophers—even philosophers sympathetic to some of Nagel’s concerns—will be disappointed by the actual quality of the argument.
Here’s how Steven Pinker linked to Leiter and Weisber’s review, on Oct. 16:
What has gotten into Thomas Nagel? Two philosophers expose the shoddy reasoning of a once-great thinker. bit.ly/SZCegd
— Steven Pinker (@sapinker) October 16, 2012
Here’s how the New Republic reported Pinker’s tweet on Mar. 8 (five months after Pinker tweeted):
[…] Steven Pinker took to Twitter and haughtily ruled that it was “the shoddy reasoning of a once-great thinker.” Fuck him, he explained.
And here’s how Barry Arrington at Uncommon Descent links to the New Republic, today:
The New Republic reports that Pinker has taken to cyberspace to stir up the Darwinist mob against Nagel. Every whiff of heresy against the true faith must be ruthlessly stamped out. Torquemada had his Auto-da-fé. Pinker has his Twitter account.
With journamalism of this caliber, I wouldn’t be surprised if UD responded to this post by saying that I set babies on fire. After eating them.
But remember: it’s the atheists and Darwiniacs who are “shrill” and “strident”.